The Skirmish at Rottingdean, 1377
first read about the skirmish of Rottingdean in Lt.
Colonel Howard Green's ‘Guide to the Battlefields of Britain and Ireland’.
He described it as ‘a raid by French pirates’ because France
was ‘too disorganised to mount a large scale retaliatory invasion’ to revenge Poitiers.
Always one to investigate the obscure, I began collecting information on the
skirmish and the persons associated with it. That was over twenty five years
ago! From my research, it soon became clear that the Lt.-Colonel was mistaken.
The raid was not an isolated one made by French pirates, but part of a
well-organised naval campaign which had been carefully prepared by the king of France
and his admiral, Jean de Vienne, during a two year
truce with England.
The Naval Campaign of
Marquis Terrier De Loray, the nineteenth century
biographer of Jean de Vienne, first described the
following version of the 1377 naval campaign. It is still accepted by many modern
historians without question. The Marquis noted that the admiral's fleet
consisted of 120 ships, including 35 large ones owned by the King of France,
and eight Castilian galleys commanded by Don Fernao
Sanchez de Tovar. On board were four to five thousand troops, plus sailors and
oarsmen. On 29 June, the Sussex
was sacked and burnt. Nearby Winchelsea escaped
attack, as the abbot of Battle
had rapidly garrisoned it. A landing was next made at Rottingdean,
where the prior of Lewes was defeated and captured. Lewes was sacked and burnt
and Folkestone similarly dealt with on 20 July. The fleet then moved on to Portsmouth,
In early August, it returned to Harfleur as the men
on board had completed their period of paid service. There had also been a
serious rift between Jean de Vienne and one of his
subordinate commanders, the Sire de Torcy, on whether
to hold Rye as a counterpoise for English Calais.
repaid, and with their leaders reconciled, the fleet put to sea again in
mid-August to support the Duke of Burgundy's attack on Calais.
Unfortunately, a gale blew the fleet to the Isle
of Wight. The French
successfully landed on 21 August, despite opposition by the inhabitants, and
wasted the island before being repulsed by the garrison of Carisbrooke
castle. After extorting 1,000 marks protection money from the island's
remaining inhabitants, the fleet sailed onto Southampton
where attempts to land at both places met with fierce resistance. The fleet
then sailed eastward to keep its appointment with the Duke of Burgundy at Calais.
On the way it attacked Winchelsea, but without
success, the town being well garrisoned again by the abbot of Battle.
was undefended and subsequently burnt. The fleet then moved onto Dover
and anchored offshore. Finding the defenders alert and well prepared, the fleet
crossed over to Calais.
After spending eight days at anchor, another gale forced the fleet to put to
sea on or about 10 September. The fleet subsequently returned to Harfleur, where it was disbanded.
An early July date for
the skirmish at Rottingdean?
the whole, the Marquis follows the sequence of events described by the
chroniclers Froissart and Walsingham,
supplemented with details from another, the Frenchman D'Orronville.
However, there is at least one error in his account. Folkestone was burnt on
St. Enswythe's day, which falls on 31 August and not
20 July. The other oddity is the timing of the skirmish at Rottingdean.
Even though Froissart and Walsingham
both place it after the landing on the Isle
of Wight (21 August), the
Marquis insists that the skirmish took place in early July. He was influenced
by Froissart's comment that the French first heard of
the death of Edward III (21 June) from prisoners taken at Rottingdean.
He argues that it would have been inconceivable for the French to be ignorant
of this important fact until late August. Nevertheless, the Marquis ignores Froissart's statement that the same prisoners also informed
the French of the coronation of Richard II. Walsingham
confirms a post-coronation date with his story of a mortally wounded Frenchmen,
declaring to his captors, that England
would not have been invaded if John of Gaunt had been made king. If this is
true, the skirmish of Rottingdean could not have
taken place before 16 July, the date of Richard's coronation. The Marquis was
also influenced by D'Orronville's incomplete account
of the 1377 naval campaign, in particular his
statement that the inhabitants of Rye
fled to the priory of Lewes after their town had been sacked and burnt on 29
June. To support this, he even points to the relative proximity of the two
places. However, Lewes is still some distance away from Rye
and it is more likely that the distressed inhabitants fled to the nearby walled
town of Winchelsea,
where the abbot of Battle
had ensconced himself with his men as soon as he heard of the French landing.
are two more pieces of evidence that also point to a late August date for the
skirmish at Rottingdean. Firstly, to supplement the
forces available for the defence of the realm, the King asked his bishops on 25 July 1377
to arm and array all abbots, priors and ecclesiastical persons in their
respective dioceses between the ages of 16 and 60. He also asked them to be
organised into twenties, hundreds and thousands. We know that the Bishop of
Winchester acted upon this request on 8 August and it is probable that the
Bishop of Chichester, in whose diocese the priory of Lewes lay, did likewise
roundabout the same time. Therefore it is unlikely that the prior of Lewes was
captured bearing arms in early July. The same applies to Thomas Wilford, parson of Ardingley, who
was also captured at Rottingdean. Admittedly, this
argument is undermined by the abbot of Battle's
defence of Winchelsea whilst Rye
was being sacked on 29 June, but it is likely that the abbot was acting then in
his secular capacity as one of the commissioners of array for Sussex.
As such, he was responsible for leading the local levies in defence of the
county. The prior of Lewes did not hold a similar appointment.
second piece of evidence is the date of death recorded for John Brocas in an inquisition post mortem held into his Kentish
lands. Unlike, similar inquisitions held in Berkshire,
the Kentish inquisitors recorded that John Brocas
died on 27
August 1377. Is this the date on
which Brocas was captured and therefore the date of
the skirmish at Rottingdean? It certainly fits in
well with the dates given for the landing on the Isle
of Wight (21 August), the
correct date for the destruction of Folkestone (31 August) and the appearance
of the French fleet off Calais
(early September). There is also a logical progression in these events,
eastwards along the south coast.
What happened during
the skirmish at Rottingdean?
seems to have been two distinct phases to the skirmish. The first took place
when the villagers tried to oppose the French landing in the chalk cliff gap
south of Rottingdean. The second occurred when the
prior of Lewes and his relief force of 500 men were defeated. By evening the
French could see them at some distance, coming towards the village from the
direction of Lewes. They therefore prepared an ambush with 300 horsemen and
allowed the prior's force to come quite close before attacking. The English
were surprised and put to flight with the loss of one hundred men. Walsingham informs us that the prior was captured, together
with his subordinates, Sir John Falvesley, Sir Thomas
Cheyne and the esquire John Brocas.
Green describes a straightforward clash between the two forces on a ridge-top
north of Rottingdean, but admits ‘there is no actual
evidence where the battle was fought’. However, Froissart's
account indicates that it might have taken place in the village itself. He
states that after the French had beaten off local resistance at the landing
place, they marched onto Lewes where they met the Prior's forces ‘in a
convenient square in front of the monastery’. After many feats of valour had
been performed, the outnumbered English were defeated with the loss of two
hundred men killed, although the French also suffered heavy casualties, notably
from the English longbowmen.
is no evidence to suggest that the French reached Lewes itself. The English
chroniclers would have mentioned it. However, it is noteworthy that there is a
‘convenient square’ in the middle of Rottingdean -
the village green - with the church lying on the eastern side. Was the English
relief force allowed to enter Rottingdean before
being ambushed by the French?
Who took part in the
tells us that there were many 'important ... rich men from the surrounding
parts who had come there to win honour'. Walsingham's
account provides us with the names of four of these men. An entry in the Close
Rolls supplies a fifth. Who were these men and why did they fight at Rottingdean? What previous military experience did they
have, if any?
The Prior of Lewes
1377, the prior of Lewes was a Frenchman called John de Caroloco
or Cherlieu. He had been prior for approximately
eleven years and was probably in his forties at the time of the skirmish. The
priory belonged to the Cluniac order, with its parent
house in France.
During wartime, 'alien' houses were normally taken into the king's hands, but
this does not seem to have happened with Lewes priory in 1377.
we have seen, the prior was defending the coast against the French in response
to an appeal from the king for his bishops to arm and array all abbots, priors
and other ecclesiastical persons within their respective dioceses. They were
expected to arm themselves according to their ‘estate, possessions and means’
and D'Orronville tells us that the prior was captured
wearing armour covered with red velvet. However, the prior had a more personal
reason for defending this part of the Sussex
coastline as many of the lands in Rottingdean
belonged to his priory. They, and the people who worked upon them, were
valuable assets worth protecting and their destruction later caused the priory
considerable financial hardship.
Brocas was born circa 1351 and belonged to a family
of Gascon origin that established itself in England
during the reign of Edward II. In Sussex,
he originally held only the manor of Shopwyck in Oving, which came to him from his maternal grandfather
Thomas de Hever. This was held from the Earl of
Arundel by knight service. However, Brocas later
inherited lands at Blatchington by Seaford,
Ripe, Selmeston, Exceat, Ewhurst and Sompting when Sir
Andrew Peverel, his mother's maternal uncle died on 3 February 1375.
Brocas held these lands from the Duke of Lancaster.
With the exception of Shopwyck, Ewhurst
and Sompting, all lie within a ten-mile radius of Rottingdean. John Brocas was
therefore following the late king's command of 16 March 1377,
which was repeated again on 14 July, for all persons with lands adjacent to the
sea coast to abide upon them and help defend the realm from the French. Failure
to do so could result in forfeiture of lands, goods or chattels by the sheriff.
Little else is known about John Brocas other than he
held the rank of esquire. He was a young man in his mid-twenties. It is not known whether he had any previous
is no contemporary evidence of the arms borne by John Brocas,
but his grandfather of the same name (died 1365) - 'one of the favourite
knights of the Black Prince' and a veteran of Poitiers
- bore the arms 'sable, a lion rampant guardant, or'. These were later borne by
his uncle, Sir Bernard Brocas (died 1395) and appear
on his tomb in Westminster Abbey.
Sir Thomas Cheyne
Thomas Cheyne had probably been a life retainer of
the Prince of Wales. In 1363, he made a settlement regarding his lands in Billingshurst and Houghton as he was about to go abroad. In
July of the same year, the Prince of Wales left Plymouth
to take up his new appointment as Prince of Aquitaine. Sir Thomas was later
present at the Prince of Wales' victory at the battle of Najera
April 1367), in Spain,
where he captured the famous French commander, Bertrand du
Guesclin. Shortly after his return to England
in 1371, the Prince promised to pay Sir Thomas £1,483 6s 6d for his captive. In
December of the same year, Sir Thomas obtained the manor of Farnborough from
William de Spridlyngton, later bishop of St. Asaph. Sprydlington was an
important member of the Prince's council.
Thomas' life retainer with the Prince ended with the death of the latter on 8 June 1376.
It is possible that he entered the service of the Earl of Arundel, but there is
no direct evidence to confirm this. However, it is perhaps noteworthy that Sir
Thomas' maternal uncle, John Houghton shared lands in Houghton village with the
Earl. Were Sir Thomas and Sir John Falvesley two of the
400 lances raised by the Earl of Arundel to defend the Sussex
coast on the understanding that the inhabitants would pay for their upkeep?
Were both men stationed in the Earl’s castle at Lewes?
date of Sir Thomas' birth is not known but at the time of the skirmish he was
probably in his mid-thirties. However, there is evidence to suggest that he
might have been much older than this, perhaps in his mid-sixties.
arms appear on a seal appended to a document in the British
February 1372. They also appear in
the Surrey Roll of Arms (circa 1392-7), where they are emblazoned 'azure, on a
fess nebuly, between three crescents or, a fleur de lis gules'.
Sir John Falvesley
John Falvesley was born circa 1335 and was therefore
in his mid-forties at the time of the skirmish. At the age of 17 he inherited
his father's manor of Fawsley in Northamptonshire.
Nothing further is heard of him until April 1365, when he was about to go to Ireland
with Lionel, Duke of Clarence. Falvesley was probably
a life retainer of the Duke and may have accompanied him to Italy
in 1368. The Duke went there to marry Violante, the
daughter of Bernarbo Visconti,
ruler of Milan.
Lionel died in October of the same year and Falvesley
probably joined the retinue of Edward Lord Despencer
soon after. Despencer, who also accompanied the Duke
subsequently joined the White Company, a band of predominantly English
mercenaries fighting for the Pope against the Visconti.
Despencer returned to England
in August 1372 and, in November of the same year, Falvesley
witnessed an indenture for life service between Despencer
and a Sir Thomas Arthur. Another witness was Sir Edward Dallingridge.
July 1373 Falvesley took part in the Duke of
Lancaster's expedition to France
as a member of Despencer's retinue. This was a
particularly tough campaign, with Lancaster's
army marching nearly 1,000 miles through the heart of France
Approximately half of his 15,000 army perished on the way. Despencer
died in November 1375 and Falvesley appears to have
joined the retinue of Richard, Earl of Arundel soon afterwards, otherwise it is
not clear why he would have been present at Rottingdean.
may have entered Arundel's service through his acquaintance with Sir Edward Dallingridge. Dallingridge held
lands in Sussex
(Fletching and Sheffield,
and later Bodiam castle) and was a member of
Arundel's affinity at this time. However, the earliest evidence of Falvesley being in Arundel's service dates to 1381, when he
is listed as one of the Earl's Chirkland feoffees. He did not hold any lands in Sussex
until 1382 when he married, without the king's licence, Elizabeth, sister and
heiress of John Say, a minor in the king's ward. Through his new wife, Falvesley acquired Buxted and Streat and the title of Lord Say.
John Falvesley's arms were 'or, two chevrons gules, a
crescent sable in dexter chief'. A plaster cast of
his seal can be seen in the British
and was probably made from an impression appended to a document dated 1 March 1387.
In the early nineteenth century, this was in the possession of a G. W. Finch
Hatton of Kirby. The tinctures come from Glover's Ordinary.
Wilford was a clerk of Chancery in the royal
household. At the time of Rottingdean, he was parson
of Ardingley and prebend of
in the cathedral church
He obtained both these benefices on 29 February 1376
through an exchange with Master Robert de Wenlyngburgh.
Thomas was probably obliged to dwell on his Sussex
lands following the king's appeal to the bishops of England
to arm and array their clergy.
only other individual mentioned at Rottingdean is a
French esquire, who had long been in the service of the prior. Walsingham does not give his name, but he bravely fought
against his fellow countrymen and was mortally wounded after being pierced in
the stomach by swords.
Destruction caused by
mentioned that 'the whole town of Lewes
was ransacked and burnt or destroyed, together with some small villages round
about'. It is doubtful whether Lewes was destroyed as there is no mention of
this in the English chronicles. Nor is the destruction of the town mentioned in
a papal letter of 1391, which merely states that the priory's possessions and
crops were destroyed by the French. Most of the destruction appears to have
been centred on Rottingdean itself. The priory held
lands in the village. So too did the priory of Sele,
for 'trustworthy persons' testified in July 1379 that ‘enemies’ had destroyed
certain lands in Rottingdean. Rottingdean
church was also burnt, and Lt.-Colonel Green asserts that scorch marks on three
of the four pillars supporting the tower date from this time. But what of the villages roundabout? Discoloured stone walls
in Ovingdean church were also caused by fire.
Destruction by French raiders in 1377 is also one of the reasons why the nearby
had been virtually abandoned by the middle of the fifteenth century. However,
the only documentary evidence we have is an entry in the Close Rolls for 13 February 1378,
which records the destruction in Sutton by Seafield
of Michael de Northburgh's house, corn and chattels
to the value of £100. The entry also states that this took place during the
last landing of the king's enemies, i.e. 1377. The only other settlement to be
destroyed in Sussex
during this stage of the campaign was Hastings,
which was burnt by a party of the French whilst their main force was bombarding
Winchelsea with guns
Captivity, ransoms and
Green states that the prisoners were carried back to France
where negotiations were undertaken to ensure their release on payment of
ransoms. D'Orronville informs us that Jean de Vienne held the prior of Lewes a prisoner for a year. The
prior was eventually released on payment of 7,000 nobles,
or approximately twice the annual income of the priory in 1391. He subsequently
returned to Lewes, and remained there until his death in 1396.
Thomas Cheyne was probably still a prisoner in France
May 1378 when his executors, his brothers John
and William Cheyne, John Houghton and Sir William Berland were named as patrons of his manor of Farnborough.
He may have been released soon after Easter 1379, for a possible down payment
of 300 marks, the first instalment of the debt owed to him by the late Prince
of Wales for Bertrand du Guesclin's
ransom. Sir Thomas died before 30
March 1381, when the Bishop of
Winchester granted his executors discharge of his will. It is possible that he
was buried in London,
where his brother William was an important officer in the law courts.
Brocas was not so lucky. According to the
inquisitions post mortem mentioned above, he is said to have died on 26 September 1377,
just a month after the skirmish. A wound probably caused Brocas’
death, as he was still a young man. A seventeenth century inscription erected
in Westminster Abbey, behind the tomb of his uncle, Sir Bernard Brocas (died 1395), lends credence to this theory. It
states that Sir Bernard's 'elder brother, Sir John', was 'slain in an
engagement with the French near Southampton'.
The inscription contains a number of inaccuracies and the reference to the
engagement at Southampton
is probably a muddled one to Sir Bernard's nephew's presence at Rottingdean. John probably died in captivity. He left no
children and his widow, Sybil, subsequently married John de Uvedale.
His Peverel lands in Sussex
went to his kinsman and heir, Sir Edmund Fitzherbert.
is not clear when Sir John Falvesley was released or
how much he was ransomed for. However, he was back in England
in 1382 when, as we have seen, he married Elizabeth Say. He appears to have
been a favourite of the Earl of Arundel and later rose
high in his service, accompanying him on his naval expeditions to Sluys in March 1387 and France
in June 1388. Sir John died in 1392 and was buried in Lewes priory, the final
resting-place of the Earls of Arundel. He left no issue.
Wilford was probably released before 14 May 1378,
when the king pardoned him for non-payment of two-tenths of his income. In
1379, it was rumoured that Thomas was going to 'pass to foreign parts, there to
prosecute many things to the prejudice of the king and people'. Was he was
going abroad to sort out payment of his, or another person's ransom? Whatever
the reason, he seems to have answered the charge to the king's satisfaction, as
there are further references to him in the Close Rolls up to 1387.
The Local Legacy of
of the skirmish quickly passed into folklore and a local proverb recorded in
the seventeenth century contrasts the sagacity of the abbot of Battle,
with the prior of Lewes, in matters of defence:
‘Ware the abbot of Battle, when the prior of
Lewes is taken prisoner’.
up until the beginning of the present century, the skirmish lived on in local
memory. Lt-Colonel Green recounts how his wife was ‘warned as a child about the
bogey of the pirates of Rottingdean, if she were
naughty’. Her family lived in nearby Telscombe.
the basis of the evidence presented above, we can conclude that:
<![endif]>The skirmish took
place in late August 1377, probably on the 27th and not in early July as
<![endif]>Although the prior was
in command, he was supported by at least two knights who had experience of wars
on the continent.
<![endif]>The prior's force
contained at least one local landowner of substance, as well as clerics and
peasants. Many of the later were armed with the longbow.
<![endif]>The prior's defeat and
capture probably took place on the village green in Rottingdean
itself after being ambushed in the evening by Jean de Vienne’s
<![endif]>Lewes town was not
burnt and the destruction caused by the French in this part of the Sussex
coastline was limited to Rottingdean and a few
<![endif]>The key prisoners
spent lengthy periods of captivity in France;
at least one died there before his ransom could be arranged. The ransoms paid
of the Skirmish
(An early English translation of Walsingham’s Latin
text, taken from Higden’s Polychronicon, Volume 8,
that men of France entered into the Isle of Wight, and did great hurt; which
taking a thousand marks for ransom returned to the sea, keeping the coasts of
England, and burning many noble places, slaying men whom they could find in the
south parts, and taking many beasts with them. For more hurt was done in England
in that year, as it was said, than in the forty years afore. Also men of France
made an assault to the town of Winchelsea,
but they could not enter into the town, nevertheless they sent diverse men
which burnt the town of Hastings.
Also men of France
entered in the same year into the town of Rottingdean,
where the prior of Lewes met them with a little number of people, which was
taken and brought to their ships with other two knights, Sir John Falvesley and Sir Thomas Cheyne,
with a squire John Brocas. But a squire born in
France being in the service with the said (prior) fought manfully against men
of France, in so much that his belly (was) cut, he fought sore, his bowels
remaining behind him a great space, and followed his enemies. In which conflict
a hundred Englishmen were slain, and many more of the
Frenchmen; which took the dead men away with them, other else they burnt their
faces with iron that they should not be known, and that Englishmen should not
solace of their death. Where a man of France
was taken, confessing afore his death that the realm of England
should not have been troubled by the men of France
if that the Duke of Lancaster had been made king.
An English translation taken from P E Thompson’s ‘Contemporary Chronicles of
the Hundred Years' War’, London
1966, pages 176-7.
they sailed along the coast of England,
Jean de Vienne and Jean de Rye, the French admirals,
and the Spanish admiral harried the land and made every effort to force a
landing for their own advantage. They came shortly before a considerable town
near the sea called Lewes, where there is a very rich priory. The people of the
surrounding country had taken refuge there with the prior and two knights, Sir
Thomas Cheyne and Sir John Falvesley.
The Earl of Salisbury and his brother were unable to get there in time, because
of the rough roads and difficult going between Lewes and the country they were
French reached the port, which they entered information, bringing their ships
as close to the land as they could; they effected their landing in spite of the
English defenders, who did what they could. As they entered Lewes there was a
deal of fighting, and many French were wounded by arrows; but they were so
numerous that they drove back their enemies, who gathered in a convenient
square in front of the monastery to await the foe approaching in close order
for a hand-to-hand fight. Many noble feats of arms were performed on both
sides, and the English defended themselves very well considering their numbers,
for they were few in comparison with the French. For this reason they exerted
themselves all the more, while the French were all the more eager to inflict
losses on the. Finally the French conquered the town and dislodged the English;
two hundred of them were killed and a large number of the more important men
taken prisoner, rich men from the surrounding parts who had come there to win
honour; the prior and the two knights were also taken. The whole town of Lewes
was ransacked and burnt or destroyed, together with some small villages round
about. By high tide the French were already back in their ships, and they set
sail with their booty and their prisoners, from whom they learned of the death
of King Edward and the coronation of King Richard.
Cabaret D'Orronville. La Chronique
du bon duc Loys, 1876, pages 71-2. An English translation from the original French text by Mr D. A. Crowder.
Messire Renier de Grimaldi having returned bringing the things that he had
promised, to the Admiral, they embarked their army for the crossing, numbering
400 horses and 2,000 troops, both men-at-arms and support troops, and they
reached the coast of England, where the English on the coast tried to prevent
them from landing, but without success because the Admiral and his force landed
and pursued them for a good league and more as far as Rye; and in that pursuit
many English were killed. And the town was then taken, overrun and burnt that
day, when many people were killed and a fair number taken to the vessels as
prisoners, and an abundance of cloth and other riches of many kinds were
seized. And a wealthy English prior, known as the
Prior of Lewes, who had learnt of the emergency from the refugees from Rye,
reaching his monastery, which was not far away; had assembled a large force to
drive out the French if he could. And to this end, during the evening the prior
arrived with a good 500 troops, some of the best men he had; but the Admiral,
who was no fool and had a strong suspicion that someone would arrive, had laid
a great ambush of 300 cavalry, hand-picked men. They saw the English coming a
long way off and let them get close, then they emerged from ambush and attacked
them, routed them and captured their leader, who was wearing armour covered
with red velvet; and the Prior of Lewes became the Admiral's prisoner as his
share of the spoils and was held captive for a year, and the Admiral was paid a
ransom of 7,000 nobles. The Admiral with his fleet withdrew from Rye
honourably and without loss and went to Paris
to join the King.
Colonel Howard Green: Guide to the Battlefields of Britain
Terrier de Loray: Jean de Vienne,
Amiral de France. Paris, 1877.
(There is an English précis of this work in John Knox Laughton's "Studies in Naval History: Biographies".
1887, reprinted 1970.)
Calendars of Close, Patent, and Fine Rolls, Papal Registers and Inquisitions
Post Mortem. (Many entries too numerous to list.)
H. Davis: William Thorne's Chronicle of St Augustine's
1934. (Destruction of Folkestone on St Enswythe's
Goodman: The Loyal Conspiracy: The Lords Appellant under Richard II. 1971.
(Some details on Falvesley)
Complete Peerage. (Entries for Falvesley, Say, and Despenser)
Burrows: The Family of Brocas of Beaurepaire
and Roche Court.
of National Biography (Entries for Brocas and
Volumes II and VII. (Entries for the Priory of Lewes and Rottingdean)
Archaeological Collections, Volume 65, 1924: Sussex
Domesday Tenants: The Family of Chesney
or Cheyne by L F Salzman.
Record Society: Wykeham's register. Edited T. S.
Kirby. (Entries for Cheyne. Mandate to arm the clergy
Fuller: The Worthies of England Edited by John Freeman, 1952 (Local proverb
on the Abbot of Battle).
To main pages